Skip to content

Conversation

@aviraxp
Copy link
Collaborator

@aviraxp aviraxp commented Nov 23, 2025

No description provided.

@aviraxp aviraxp marked this pull request as draft November 23, 2025 05:53
backslashxx pushed a commit to backslashxx/KernelSU that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Kernel has few information about which isolated process belongs to which
application, so there is actually no good choice if we don't implement a
userspace daemon. One choice is to access cmdline memory from kernel,
but cmdline is __user, and it is likely to trigger detections. Before we
have more good ideas, use this.

upstream: tiann#2972
@backslashxx
Copy link
Contributor

backslashxx commented Nov 23, 2025

image

so I guess at this point either you will have to manage kernel umount (managedFeatures) in zn or pre-delete the entries that zn will umount.

backslashxx pushed a commit to backslashxx/KernelSU that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Kernel has few information about which isolated process belongs to which
application, so there is actually no good choice if we don't implement a
userspace daemon. One choice is to access cmdline memory from kernel,
but cmdline is __user, and it is likely to trigger detections. Before we
have more good ideas, use this.

upstream: tiann#2972
backslashxx pushed a commit to backslashxx/KernelSU that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Kernel has few information about which isolated process belongs to which
application, so there is actually no good choice if we don't implement a
userspace daemon. One choice is to access cmdline memory from kernel,
but cmdline is __user, and it is likely to trigger detections. Before we
have more good ideas, use this.

upstream: tiann#2972
Kernel has few information about which isolated process belongs to which
application, so there is actually no good choice if we don't implement a
userspace daemon. One choice is to access cmdline memory from kernel,
but cmdline is __user, and it is likely to trigger detections. Before we
have more good ideas, use this.
@aviraxp aviraxp marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2025 10:49
@aviraxp aviraxp merged commit e1e58ed into main Nov 23, 2025
15 checks passed
@aviraxp aviraxp deleted the umount branch November 23, 2025 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants