Updated Cluster and VirtualClusterPolicy spec for sync and loadbalancer

[enrichman]

This PR cleanup the spec of the sync field, and fix a couple of missing camel case for the configMaps and loadBalancer.

It add the default for the "false" struct to avoid the current status:

expose:
  loadbalancer: {}
sync:
  configmaps:
    enabled: true
  ingresses: {}
  persistentVolumeClaims:
    enabled: true
  priorityClasses: {}
  secrets:
    enabled: true
  services:
    enabled: true

Now the spec will be created with also the false fields:

expose:
  loadBalancer: {}
sync:
  configMaps:
    enabled: true
  ingresses:
    enabled: false
  persistentVolumeClaims:
    enabled: true
  priorityClasses:
    enabled: false
  secrets:
    enabled: true
  services:
    enabled: true

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 54.87%. Comparing base (cebf659) to head (bc0849c).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #528      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.60%   54.87%   -4.74%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines        5132     5132              
==========================================
- Hits         3059     2816     -243     
- Misses       1801     2054     +253     
+ Partials      272      262      -10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cli	53.70% <ø> (+0.57%)	⬆️
controller	51.48% <ø> (-6.92%)	⬇️
e2e	51.48% <ø> (-6.92%)	⬇️
unit	41.70% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[bigkevmcd]

Can you fix the examples so that they will cleanly apply?