Skip to content

Minor fixes #891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kbattocchi merged 6 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

Minor fixes #891

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
dac7b4b
Add blog reference to README
kbattocchi Jun 10, 2024
8dcdbb5
Set n_estimators correctly for DRPolicyForest
kbattocchi Jun 10, 2024
b20fcf2
Correct minor CausalForestDML documenation issue
kbattocchi Mar 21, 2024
4fbd10e
Add "help wanted" content to README
kbattocchi Jun 26, 2024
5a3dbf0
Enable support for scikit-learn 1.5
kbattocchi Jun 27, 2024
3dff057
Prevent use of numpy 2.0
kbattocchi Jun 28, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
[![PyPI wheel](https://img.shields.io/pypi/wheel/econml.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/econml/)
[![Supported Python versions](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/econml.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/econml/)



<h1>
<a href="https://econml.azurewebsites.net/">
<img src="doc/econml-logo-icon.png" width="80px" align="left" style="margin-right: 10px;", alt="econml-logo">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -691,6 +689,8 @@ We use GitHub Actions to build and publish the package and documentation. To cr

# Blogs and Publications

* May 2021: [Be Careful When Interpreting Predictive Models in Search of Causal Insights](https://towardsdatascience.com/be-careful-when-interpreting-predictive-models-in-search-of-causal-insights-e68626e664b6)

* June 2019: [Treatment Effects with Instruments paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.10176.pdf)

* May 2019: [Open Data Science Conference Workshop](https://odsc.com/speakers/machine-learning-estimation-of-heterogeneous-treatment-effect-the-microsoft-econml-library/)
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion econml/policy/_drlearner.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -854,7 +854,8 @@ def _gen_drpolicy_learner(self):
cv=self.cv,
mc_iters=self.mc_iters,
mc_agg=self.mc_agg,
model_final=PolicyForest(max_depth=self.max_depth,
model_final=PolicyForest(n_estimators=self.n_estimators,
max_depth=self.max_depth,
min_samples_split=self.min_samples_split,
min_samples_leaf=self.min_samples_leaf,
min_weight_fraction_leaf=self.min_weight_fraction_leaf,
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions econml/tests/test_policy_forest.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -321,8 +321,8 @@ def test_non_standard_input(self,):
model_propensity=DummyClassifier(strategy='uniform'),
featurizer=PolynomialFeatures(degree=1, include_bias=False),
cv=GroupKFold(n_splits=2),
n_estimators=20, n_jobs=1, random_state=123).fit(y, T, X=X,
groups=groups)
n_estimators=100, n_jobs=1, random_state=123).fit(y, T, X=X,
Copy link
Collaborator

@fverac fverac Jun 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this for test stability?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@kbattocchi kbattocchi Jun 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because n_estimators was never passed correctly to DRPolicyForest in the past, this has always effectively run with n_estimators=100 (the default value), and the tests don't pass if we actually pass 20 through instead.

groups=groups)
mask = np.abs(Xraw[:, 0]) > .1
np.testing.assert_allclose(pred[mask], forest.predict(Xraw[mask]))
np.testing.assert_allclose(pred_val[mask, 1] - pred_val[mask, 0],
Expand Down