-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
OCPBUGS-73778: revert LSO networkpolicy cases #30684
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
@duanwei33: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69844, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
82c7fa0 to
a6d8767
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: duanwei33 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
871719f to
f5d9252
Compare
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
Microshift jobs failed at the installation phase, the cases actually don't get executed in Microshift, so it could be ignored. |
|
/retest |
|
@duanwei33: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@dobsonj Hi, could you please take a look on this? |
|
@duanwei33: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73778, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@duanwei33: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73778, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: f5d9252
|
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-69844
This reverts #30562 because our build pipeline will block release of OLM-managed operators with NetworkPolicy manifests until after the 4.21 release, see bug for details.
E2E test should be removed as the feature code is also reverted in openshift/local-storage-operator#568