Skip to content

Conversation

@sxa
Copy link
Member

@sxa sxa commented Jan 14, 2026

Re-enable the exclusion of this test which was re-enabled in #51995 after previously being excluded in #50262 as I /have/ been able to reproduce the failures in the CI 79/1000 times with the stress job this week.

Ref: #50245

@sxa sxa requested a review from abmusse January 14, 2026 11:05
@sxa sxa self-assigned this Jan 14, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Jan 14, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.51%. Comparing base (903f647) to head (4679f52).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #61381      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.54%   88.51%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         704      704              
  Lines      208793   208793              
  Branches    40307    40309       +2     
==========================================
- Hits       184866   184807      -59     
- Misses      15913    15965      +52     
- Partials     8014     8021       +7     

see 26 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants