types/authkey: include user object in response

[kradalby]

Fixes #2520
Fixes #2492
Fixes #2487

[ghost]

Pull Request Revisions

Revision	Description
r9	Pre-auth key creation uses mapped user Modified pre-auth key creation to use user ID from mapped users instead of hardcoded username
r8	User ID replaces username for keys The project modified multiple files to transition pre-authentication key operations from using usernames to using user IDs. This involved updating gRPC proto definitions, CLI commands, integration tests, and various backend methods to work with user IDs as uint64 instead of string usernames.
r7	Refactored IP check and key expiration Updated IP comparison to use slices.Contains() and modified user ID handling in key expiration command
r6	Pre-auth key uses user ID Updated pre-authentication key API and related components to use user ID instead of username, including changes to protobuf definitions, gRPC server, CLI, and integration tests. This involves modifying type conversions, function signatures, and how users are referenced in pre-auth key operations.
r5	Pre-auth key API uses IDs Major changes include modifying pre-auth key API and CLI to use user IDs instead of usernames, updating protobuf definitions, and adjusting related code to support numeric user identification
r4	Updated user creation and key management Modified integration tests and control interfaces to handle user creation with ID, return user objects, and use user IDs for pre-auth key creation
r3	Pre-auth key API now uses ID Changed pre-authentication key API/CLI to use numeric user ID instead of username string in multiple components
r2	Pre-auth keys now return full user API for pre-authentication keys modified to return complete user object instead of string representation
r1	Updated protobuf generation for v1.36.6 Updated generated protobuf files with protoc-gen-go version 1.36.6, including changes to PreAuthKey to use User type instead of username string

---

✅ AI review completed for r9

Help

React with emojis to give feedback on AI-generated reviews:

• 👍 means the feedback was helpful and actionable
• 👎 means the feedback was incorrect or unhelpful

💬 Replying to feedback with a comment helps us improve the system. Your input also contributes to shaping future interactions with the AI reviewer.

We'd love to hear from you—reach out anytime at [email protected].